AI Development That Stays on Track
We built 1.1 million lines of code with AI assistance. Here's how we made it reliable.
The Promise vs. Reality
AI coding assistants promise autonomous work. Reality requires constant supervision.
The gap isn't the AI's capability—it's the lack of infrastructure to make that capability reliable. Prompt engineering degrades. Instructions get ignored. Context disappears.
Guardrailed AI is different. It's infrastructure-level enforcement that works whether you remember to ask nicely or not.
THE 7 PROBLEMS
Your AI Coding Assistant Has 7 Problems
These aren't bugs—they're paradigm problems. Inherent to how agentic AI works.
Context Loss
"Dumber after compaction"
Every session starts from zero. The AI forgets architectural decisions, coding standards, and project knowledge.
2Silent Failures
"100% of the time ignores failing tests"
Claims success when tests fail. Modifies tests to pass instead of fixing code. Trust-destroying behavior.
3Guardrail Bypass
"I understood the rules but chose other behavior"
CLAUDE.md gets ignored after 2-5 prompts. Instructions ARE in context but don't override trained patterns.
4Quality Regression
"Cyclical bug-fixing loops"
Fix one thing, break another. The death spiral of AI-assisted development without verification.
5Incomplete Implementations
"First attempt will be 95% garbage"
Skips tests, wiring, edge cases. Marks task complete without running verification.
6Scope Creep
"Asked for one line, got 47 changed files"
Does more than asked. 'Helpful' refactoring that breaks working code.
7Wiring Failures
"Code exists but isn't connected"
Creates the class, forgets to register it. Integration gaps that only surface in production.
THE SOLUTIONS
Infrastructure, Not Instructions
Each problem has a specific architectural solution—not a prompt tweak.
Session Handoff System
Database-persisted context that survives compaction, session ends, and model switches.
1,000+ handoffs, 92% automation, 100% context restoration
11-Dimension Audit System
100 automated checks with BLOCKER severity. Can't claim completion until verification passes.
9,309 test functions, 0 falsified completions
Multi-Layer Enforcement
4 layers: CLAUDE.md + pre-commit hooks + forbidden pattern checks + bypass audit trail.
515 'Do NOT' rules, all bypasses logged to database
Spec-Driven Verification
YAML specs define exactly what 'done' means. Executable checks verify actual behavior.
42 spec files, 137 must_exist rules, 140 must_contain patterns
Exit Gate System
Custom checks with expected output. Not 'it compiled'—actual executable verification.
1,350 exit gate references across codebase
Explicit Boundaries
Work package specs define exactly which files to touch. Nothing more.
509 'Do NOT' rules define what's off-limits
Four Laws Checker
Automated Protocol/Implementation pattern verification. Every *Impl needs *Protocol.
416 protocol classes tracked, 0 violations
THE PROOF
We Didn't Just Design It. We Built It.
CleanAim® was built using CleanAim®—twice. Same methodology we offer to customers.
THE METHODOLOGY
Constitutional, Not Coincidental
Constitutional
Systems that enforce their own rules. Not guidelines that can be ignored—architectural constraints that cannot be bypassed.
Verified
Every claim is checkable. 'Task complete' means verification passed, not 'I think I'm done.'
Compound
Learning that builds on itself. 57,338 genetic patterns evolved through success and failure.
Portable
Works across Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, and more. Learning transfers between providers.
See Which Problems Hurt You Most
Get a diagnostic of your AI development workflow and a plan to fix it.
Get Your Diagnostic